Six honest questions to ask before setting up an SMSF

An SMSF can be a powerful way to hold property inside super, but the structure is not right for everyone. Here are the six questions worth sitting with before you commit.

Six honest questions to ask before setting up an SMSF

You have heard it from a colleague, read it in a Facebook group, or had a broker mention it in passing: set up an SMSF and buy property inside super. The idea is appealing. But the gap between "interesting concept" and "compliant, cost-effective fund" is wider than most people expect. These six questions cut to the core of whether an SMSF makes sense for your situation.

1. Is your combined super balance large enough to justify the costs?

There is no legal minimum to set up an SMSF. The ATO does not set a specific threshold. But ASIC, along with many industry experts, generally considers a balance of around $200,000 to be more cost-effective when compared to traditional superannuation funds. The reason is straightforward: SMSF costs are largely fixed. The median administration and operating expenses for an SMSF, including audit, accounting, levy and other costs, sit around $4,628 per year based on 2023-2025 lodgements. One-off setup costs typically add $1,500 to $3,500, with ongoing annual costs of $2,000 to $5,000 depending on complexity.

If property via a Limited Recourse Borrowing Arrangement (LRBA) is the goal, the bar is higher. Generally, most lenders will require a minimum balance of $200,000 in an SMSF when considering finance for a property purchase, and many require a deposit of 30% or higher. A fund that holds one property with little cash remaining will also struggle with liquidity, a compliance and cashflow risk that an SMSF specialist accountant should model out before you proceed.

2. Do you understand what the sole purpose test actually requires?

Every decision a trustee makes is judged against a single standard. The sole purpose of your SMSF is to provide retirement benefits to your members, or to pay death benefits if a member dies before retirement. To be eligible for the tax concessions normally available to super funds, your SMSF must meet the sole purpose test. This is a strict standard. Per the ATO (ato.gov.au), an example of breaching the sole purpose test is where your SMSF invests in a rental property specifically to allow a related party to live in that property.

The practical implications for property investors are direct: you cannot live in the property, your family members cannot live in it, and you cannot rent it to relatives. The test is set in section 62 of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SIS Act). Breaches can attract penalties. More serious or repeated breaches can attract administrative penalties, currently $4,200 per individual trustee per offence under the SIS penalty regime, which means a fund with four individual trustees can face $16,800 in penalties for a single breach.

3. Does the property you want to buy actually fit inside an SMSF LRBA?

This is the question that trips up the most people. An SMSF can borrow to buy property using an LRBA, which involves holding the asset in a bare trust until the loan is repaid. But there is a critical constraint: an SMSF cannot borrow to buy land and build. When an SMSF borrows money, it can only purchase a single acquirable asset. The ATO judges the land and the building contract as separate assets.

This means a standard house-and-land package with two separate contracts, one for the land, one for the build, does not comply with LRBA rules when financing is involved. The purchase must involve a single contract for the acquisition of a completed, identifiable asset. You cannot purchase a vacant block of land and then borrow funds to construct a dwelling on it. For an LRBA to work, you must be purchasing a house and land package under one single contract. This distinction is critical, and failing to adhere to it will render the entire arrangement non-compliant.

Established properties with a single title, or new builds sold under a single contract, are the structures that work. Always verify the contract structure with an SMSF specialist accountant before paying a deposit.

4. Are you ready for the ongoing trustee obligations?

When you become a trustee, you take on personal legal responsibility for everything the fund does. Your SMSF must be audited each year by an independent SMSF auditor who is registered with ASIC. The auditor will assess your fund's compliance with super laws and report any contraventions to the ATO. You must also lodge an annual return, maintain a written investment strategy, keep records of every decision, and value assets at market value each year.

Managing an SMSF takes time and discipline. Trustees must research investments, handle financial paperwork, and stay updated with ATO changes. Even with technology tools, it remains a hands-on process. If two of you are trustees and one exits the fund, through divorce, death, or dispute, the fund may face forced asset sales and significant restructuring costs. These are things to think through before you sign a trust deed.

5. Does your fund have a sensible investment strategy, including liquidity?

Holding a single property in an SMSF can create a concentration problem. Some SMSFs heavily invest in property, which may cause liquidity issues during retirement. If most of your fund's value is tied to one property, you might struggle to pay pensions or cover expenses without selling the asset.

The ATO requires every SMSF to have a written investment strategy that addresses risk, return, diversification, and liquidity. That strategy must be reviewed regularly, not just filed once and forgotten. A fund that holds a leveraged property also needs enough free cash to meet LRBA repayments, rates, insurance, maintenance, and potential vacancy periods without forcing a fire sale. An independent rental appraisal before purchase is important for understanding realistic rental yield and what vacancy periods could cost the fund.

6. Have you compared the full cost against staying in an industry or retail fund?

SMSF fees are largely fixed, whereas industry and retail fund fees are often percentage-based. In an SMSF versus industry fund comparison, the fixed-fee nature of SMSFs becomes more advantageous as your balance grows. A higher balance means the fixed annual costs represent a smaller percentage of your retirement savings. But at lower balances, the math can go the other way. A $150,000 SMSF paying $3,500 in annual costs effectively pays 2.3% in fees. A $300,000 SMSF paying the same $3,500 in costs reduces fees to 1.1%. This simple math shows why SMSFs tend to become more cost-effective as your super balance grows beyond $200,000.

There are also features you lose when you leave a large super fund. Unlike many retail funds, SMSFs don't include automatic insurance coverage, and trustees need to arrange separate policies. The cost of replacing life and total permanent disability insurance outside a large fund should be factored into any cost comparison.

A worked illustration

Consider a couple in accumulation phase with a combined SMSF balance of $350,000. They purchase a completed residential investment property for $550,000 using an LRBA: a 30% deposit of $165,000 from the fund (leaving $185,000 in liquid assets for compliance buffers, costs, and ongoing obligations), with $385,000 borrowed.

In accumulation phase, rental income earned by the fund is taxed at 15% per the standard super tax rate, not at the trustees' personal marginal rates. If the property is held for more than 12 months before sale, the effective CGT rate inside the fund is 10% in accumulation phase, or zero if the fund has moved to pension phase at the time of sale, up to the Transfer Balance Cap (currently $1.9 million per member, though this cap is indexed and should be verified with a licensed adviser at the time of planning).

This illustration is general only. Actual outcomes depend on fund structure, the specific LRBA terms agreed with a lender at the time of application, rental income received, vacancies, and the fund's overall position. No two situations are identical.

Three practical next steps

  1. Get a cost comparison in writing. Ask an SMSF specialist accountant to model the all-in annual cost of running an SMSF at your current balance against what you pay in your existing fund. Include setup, compliance, audit, insurance, and LRBA costs.

  2. Check the contract structure before you pick a property. If you are considering a new build, confirm with a solicitor and your accountant whether the contract is a compliant single-contract structure for LRBA purposes. Do this before paying any deposit.

  3. Talk to a licensed specialist broker about LRBA lending conditions. SMSF lending criteria differ substantially from standard residential lending. A broker who specialises in SMSF finance will give you a clear picture of what deposit, liquidity buffer, and documentation a lender will require at the time of application.

For more general information on how EWC sources property for SMSFs and connects clients with specialist lenders, see our services page or book a free call to talk through your situation.

General information only, not personal financial advice. Speak with a licensed adviser before acting.

Talk it through

Want to apply this to your situation?

15-minute strategy call. No cost, no obligation. We'll listen, ask a few questions, and tell you honestly whether we can help.